Also, I’ve learned that, even after 20 years or recovery, I am incapable of reliably picking out who will stay sober and who won’t. I’m left having to treat everyone like they’re going to make it.
Our own Jason Schwartz is interviewed by Pea Pod on Binge inking.
I discovered the Addiction & Recovery News blog fairly early in my own recovery and got hooked quickly. I’ve built up respect for Jason Schwartz (JS) and his team and the work they do at Dawn Farm. We’ve corresponded by email from time to time, but recently I invited Jason to a question and answer session to share a bit about Dawn Farm, his own experience and to compare and contrast his perspective on the recovery movement in the US and in the UK. Here’s the first instalment.
Pretty cool stuff!
Behavior change and motivation to change are interesting to me. I have spent a lot of time thinking about how to maximize the likelihood that someone “gets it” (hope) while they are in treatment or detox and starts to take action. When all of the stars line up it is a beautiful and rewarding thing to witness and be part of. We can help set the stage, but that there is so much that we cant see, predict or control.
This paper by Ken Resnicow and Roger Vaughan looks at behavior change through the lens of Chaos Theory. It nicely articulates many of the observations I have had over time and makes a lot of sense to me. It is full of gems, but I especially like this quote which focuses on what our role may be in helping our clients. It provides hope that even the most seemingly “tough” cases can get it. Our role may be to just do what we can to ensure that the ping pong balls keep spinning.
“In the complex system approach, the role of health communications may be analogous to the spinning of ping pong balls in a lottery machine. Say that each ping pong ball represents a chunk of knowledge, attitude, efficacy, or intention. On each ball lies a few strips of Velcro; the soft side. Inside the human psyche lies strips of the opposite, hard side of Velcro, which serve as potential motivational “receptors”. Some of the motivational ping pong balls may have resided in the system for years while others may have been more recently implanted through a health education program, clinical counseling encounter, or health communication campaign. Rather than attempting to predict which piece or pieces of motivation may “tip” the individual, from the chaotic perspective, the role of the health professional is to ensure the balls are kept spinning at various intervals and velocities to maximize the chances that they adhere to their receptors. When sufficient balls have adhered a tipping point may occur. Which balls or combination of balls may trip the motivational switch as well as when and why they may stick, are chaotic events that defy accurate prediction. From a non-linear perspective, the goal of health professionals may be to encourage wing flapping.”
Neuron has a special issue on addiction. Content is temporarily free. To check it out it click on the article and then click on the PDF link under Article Information.
Two articles on mechanisms of change in AA.
The first looks at spirituality and concludes:
“Findings suggest that AA leads to better alcohol use outcomes, in part, by enhancing individuals’ spiritual practices and provides support for AA’s own emphasis on increasing spiritual practices to facilitate recovery from alcohol use disorder.”
The second at A.A. related helping and the helper therapy principal:
“Helping others in the program of AA has forged a therapy based on the kinship of common suffering, a social pioneering having a vast potential for the myriad other ills of mankind. A large body of research supports the HTP in clinical populations sharing a chronic condition beyond addiction, such as AIDS or pain. When humans help others regardless of a shared condition, they appear to live longer and happier lives.”
Among the findings:
“The increases in youth drug use reflected in the Monitoring the Future Study are disappointing. And mixed messages about drug legalization, particularly marijuana legalization, may be to blame. Such messages certainly don’t help parents who are trying to prevent young people from using drugs.”
“One reason teens have such easy access to drugs is because dealers are embedded in their social networks. It’s usually easier to ask a peer for a dime-bag than it is to ask an older sibling for a pack of smokes or a six-pack.”
“This year, 21.4% of high school seniors said they had used marijuana in the last 30 days, while 19.2% reported smoking cigarettes in the same time period, according to the annual “Monitoring the Future” survey from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It was the first time since 1981 that pot surpassed tobacco in that age group.”
PBS NEWS HOUR did a segment on the report
Addendum: Here is a comment from a friend which I found interesting.
“I also wonder if anyone else finds it ironic that the ONDCP took full credit for the previously declining rates of youth marijuana use (attributing it to their Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign) and now blames “drug legalization” for the rising rates. The ONDCP’s support of draconian measures against marijuana users has probably done more to fuel support of marijuana legalization than the rhetoric from legalization advocates has.”
I hadn’t thought about the trend toward liberalization of pot laws as backlash, but it makes sense. Maybe we can find some middle ground. In any case there is a lot of solid evidence that marijuana is bad for kids and the fact is that more kids are using it and that attitudes toward it are shifting. Is this really a result of “mixed messages” as the ONDCP claims? I would guess so.
A few points:
The Iranian H.I. V. problem, unlike the one in the U.S., is largely driven by intravenous drug use (IDU).
The author notes:
“By recent measures, 62 percent of H.I.V. infections in Russia came directly from a shared needle. In Malaysia it is 76 percent, in Iran 68 percent.”
In comparison, according to the CDC , in the U.S. the percentage of new H.I. V. infections related to IDU is around 12-16%. Not insignificant, but obviously a very different state of affairs.
Also, the author suggests that:
“Doctors could be particularly influential in opening up the last frontier for methadone and needle exchange in America: prisons. Prisons hold large numbers of drug users, at the peak of their motivation to change, who make up quite literally a captive audience. They are not just the place where harm reduction is most needed, they are also the ideal place to offer help. If only we could.”
“The peak of their motivation to change” and we should give them clean syringes and methadone? Ouch! What about recovery oriented treatment?
Looking at addiction solely through a public health lens leaves much to be desired. Nothing in the article about recovery and only a little about treatment, which I assume was not recovery oriented.
The impact of the Iranian policy is not all bad, it does sound like people suffering addiction in Iran are being treated more humanely than they were in the past and that move toward harm reduction has helped to shift the focus from one that is criminal/moral to a more health oriented model. Addicts are also being engaged and offered services that they may never have had access to in the past. Yet, harm reduction without an emphasis on recovery is so hopeless.
I really like this paragraph from one of Jason’s past posts:
“Ideas like this are rooted in despair, rather than hope. We get overwhelmed by the problem. We’re too cheap to offer adequate help. We don’t believe that these people can recover. We think they have no chance. We’re scared that they’ll hurt us and get us sick. So, we offer them these kinds of interventions. Often, these programs represented in the name of choice, when, the addicts themselves, want better from us. They actually want to get well, but often lose hope that it’s possible for them. The system starts patting them on the head an encouraging them to be more realistic. What they need from professional helpers is for us to lend them our hope to cultivate some of their own. They need a system that stops talking about if they recover and starts talking about when they recover.”
It has been said that “the good can be the enemy of the best” The following quote from the article says a lot:
“‘There is a rule in Islam that between bad and worse, you have to accept bad,’ said one Iranian drug expert, ‘Having needle and syringe programs is bad, but having H.I.V. is worse. There is no third option.'”
Yes there is, and many more …
When I saw the post on disrupting memory retrieval to prevent relapse it brought to mind this from a couple weeks ago. Similarities between addiction cues and PTSD are interesting. Both articles discuss the relative ineffectiveness of exposure therapy and the promise of propranolol in mediating the super charged memories.
Here is a paragraph from the addiction article:
“Along with the discovery of propranolol’s cocaine-memory blocking effects, the researchers also have identified the primary players in the brain responsible for ‘extinction’ learning – the ability to replace cocaine-associated memories with associations that have no drug ‘reward.'”
And here is one from the PTSD article:
“Propranolol treatment takes a different approach. It is based on the notion that memories, once they are consolidated, can be retrieved, and they exist in a labile state during which they are susceptible to modification until they are reconsolidated. During the labile window of opportunity, which is believed to be several hours, administration of propranolol can strip the memory of its emotional meaning, making it less stressful, he explained.”
Tobacco use remains the single most preventable cause of death — causing about 440,000 deaths per year in the United States. Almost half of these deaths occur among people with mental and substance use disorders.
“This study shows that the effects of chronic alcohol consumption on brain chemistry are critically influenced by an individual’s pre-existing genetic makeup,” said lead author Panayotis (Peter) Thanos, a neuroscientist with Brookhaven Lab and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Laboratory of Neuroimaging. “Our findings may help explain how someone’s genetic profile can interact with the environment — in this case, chronic alcohol drinking — to produce these changes only in some individuals, but not in others with a less vulnerable genetic profile. The work supports the idea that genetic screening could provide individuals with valuable information relevant to understanding risks when deciding whether or not to consume alcohol.”