First, the NYT Review of Books published a review of three books that cast doubt upon our faith in psychotropics.
Then, the Times published a defense of antidepressants.
Now, the contentious dialog continues with three letters to the editor from very esteemed psychiatrists and then a response from the writer of the original review. (A former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.)
Check it out. Who do you think is more persuasive?